Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Decentraland vs Meteora” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | MANA | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.066527 | $0.157339 |
| Market Cap | $130.29M | $85.43M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $8.19M | $5.95M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 213.00 | 280.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | MANA | MET |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.30% | -6.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | MANA | MET |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for MANA/MET currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | MANA | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Decentraland
Meteora
Pros and cons
Pros of Decentraland
- Decentraland has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for Decentraland can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Decentraland typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Decentraland
- Large-cap status for Decentraland can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, Decentraland can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around MANA sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Decentraland harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Meteora
- Narrative optionality around Meteora can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on MET sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Meteora can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Decentraland with Meteora can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Meteora
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Meteora more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on Meteora often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Meteora.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Decentraland on size and Decentraland on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Decentraland holds market-cap $130.29M and rank #213; Meteora shows $85.43M and #280. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Decentraland. Where durability matters, watch Decentraland. AI composite scores (57.70/57.70) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Decentraland or Meteora?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Decentraland leads on market cap today, while Decentraland leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, MANA or MET?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Decentraland and Meteora.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Decentraland currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Decentraland, but longer windows can disagree.