Overview
Whether you arrived from a “JST vs USAT” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | USAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.106840 | $1,882.43 |
| Market Cap | $872.95M | $185.24M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.54M | $2.54M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 73.00 | 168.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | USAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.39% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | USAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for JST/USAT currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | USAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
USAT
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- JST typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- JST often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- JST has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of JST
- Crowded positioning around JST sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JST harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of USAT
- If technical momentum aligns, USAT may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on USAT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- USAT can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of USAT
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus JST can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for USAT.
- Higher volatility on USAT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for JST on size and USAT on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JST holds market-cap $872.95M and rank #73; USAT shows $185.24M and #168. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch USAT. Where durability matters, watch JST. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or USAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while JST leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or USAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and USAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JST, but longer windows can disagree.