Overview
From a portfolio lens, JST ($867.89M) and Celestia ($322.88M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.106110 | $0.329600 |
| Market Cap | $867.89M | $322.88M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.51M | $915,221.58 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 74.00 | 121.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.67% | +2.77% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JST shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while Celestia sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 33.00 |
| Github activity | — | 994.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
Celestia
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- JST typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on JST may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for JST can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- JST often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of JST
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around JST sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for JST can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Celestia
- PEPS tracking for Celestia still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, Celestia may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on TIA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Celestia
- Relative underperformance versus JST can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Celestia more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on TIA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JST, while short-term performance leans toward Celestia. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JST holds market-cap $867.89M and rank #74; Celestia shows $322.88M and #121. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch JST. Where durability matters, watch JST. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or Celestia?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while Celestia leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or TIA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and Celestia.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JST currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Celestia, but longer windows can disagree.