Overview
JUP vs GENIUS is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.196400 | $0.328600 |
| Market Cap | $651.09M | $110.57M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.43M | $173,767.83 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 86.00 | 243.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.99% | +1.58% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across JUP and GENIUS, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
GENIUS
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on JUP may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for JUP can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of JUP
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JUP harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for JUP can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of GENIUS
- Active volume bursts on GENIUS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- GENIUS can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of GENIUS
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for GENIUS.
- Relative underperformance versus JUP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GENIUS more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. JUP and GENIUS can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: JUP (JUP) trades near $0.196400 with a +2.99% day move, while GENIUS (GENIUS) is around $0.328600 (+1.58%). Volume leadership currently sits with JUP, and market-cap leadership with JUP. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or GENIUS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while JUP leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or GENIUS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and GENIUS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JUP, but longer windows can disagree.