Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means HYPE and ULTIMA are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HYPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,853.59 | $1,853.59 |
| Market Cap | $11.43B | $210.19M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $234.50M | $2.48M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 10.00 | 154.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HYPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.70% | +2.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HYPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across HYPE and ULTIMA, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HYPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HYPE
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of HYPE
- Composite PEPS readings for HYPE can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for HYPE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on HYPE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of HYPE
- When dominance narratives fade, HYPE can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for HYPE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on HYPE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of ULTIMA
- Active volume bursts on ULTIMA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around ULTIMA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, ULTIMA may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ULTIMA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on ULTIMA often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. HYPE and ULTIMA can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. HYPE holds market-cap $11.43B and rank #10; ULTIMA shows $210.19M and #154. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch HYPE. Where durability matters, watch HYPE. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, HYPE or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HYPE leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HYPE or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HYPE and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. HYPE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.