Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Provenance Blockchain vs Immutable” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007715 | $0.111921 |
| Market Cap | $432.21M | $223.85M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2,020.99 | $6.59M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 105.00 | 264.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -8.50% | +3.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Provenance Blockchain
Immutable
Pros and cons
Pros of Provenance Blockchain
- Provenance Blockchain typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Provenance Blockchain can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Provenance Blockchain
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Provenance Blockchain can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on Provenance Blockchain may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Immutable
- If technical momentum aligns, Immutable may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for Immutable still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on IMX sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Immutable can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Immutable
- Relative underperformance versus Provenance Blockchain can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on Immutable often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Provenance Blockchain) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Immutable) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Provenance Blockchain (HASH) trades near $0.007715 with a -8.50% day move, while Immutable (IMX) is around $0.111921 (+3.70%). Volume leadership currently sits with Immutable, and market-cap leadership with Provenance Blockchain. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Provenance Blockchain or Immutable?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Provenance Blockchain leads on market cap today, while Immutable leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or IMX?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Provenance Blockchain and Immutable.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Immutable currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Immutable, but longer windows can disagree.