Overview
Investors searching HASH vs GUSD usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. HASH prints $1,853.59 (-7.00%) while GUSD is at $1,853.59 (+0.10%), with volume edge currently on GUSD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,853.59 | $1,853.59 |
| Market Cap | $444.65M | $149.61M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3,042.49 | $794,905.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 105.00 | 198.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -7.00% | +0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on HASH and bearish on GUSD. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HASH
GUSD
Pros and cons
Pros of HASH
- Market-cap scale on HASH may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- HASH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- HASH has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- HASH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of HASH
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on HASH may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, HASH can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of GUSD
- GUSD can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for GUSD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around GUSD can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of GUSD
- Higher volatility on GUSD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GUSD more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus HASH can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. HASH holds market-cap $444.65M and rank #105; GUSD shows $149.61M and #198. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch GUSD. Where durability matters, watch HASH. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, HASH or GUSD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HASH leads on market cap today, while GUSD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or GUSD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HASH and GUSD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GUSD, but longer windows can disagree.