Overview
From a portfolio lens, GUSD ($149.64M) and GENIUS ($110.58M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GUSD | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $0.330000 |
| Market Cap | $149.64M | $110.58M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $798,498.00 | $186,384.91 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 196.00 | 243.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GUSD | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +0.24% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GUSD | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on GUSD and bearish on GENIUS. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GUSD | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GUSD
GENIUS
Pros and cons
Pros of GUSD
- Market-cap scale on GUSD may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- GUSD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for GUSD can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of GUSD
- Indicator stacks on GUSD may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for GUSD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around GUSD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of GENIUS
- PEPS tracking for GENIUS still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- GENIUS can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus GUSD with GENIUS can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of GENIUS
- Higher volatility on GENIUS cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus GUSD can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GENIUS more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. GUSD holds market-cap $149.64M and rank #196; GENIUS shows $110.58M and #243. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch GUSD. Where durability matters, watch GUSD. AI composite scores (57.80/57.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, GUSD or GENIUS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GUSD leads on market cap today, while GENIUS leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GUSD or GENIUS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GUSD and GENIUS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GENIUS, but longer windows can disagree.