Overview
This page compares Cosmos Hub and GUSD with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#85 vs #197) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ATOM | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.27 | $1,882.43 |
| Market Cap | $723.29M | $149.63M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.46M | $681,811.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 85.00 | 197.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ATOM | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.35% | +0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ATOM | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 18.97 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.05 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 51.19 | 21.33 |
| Support | — | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1.61 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for ATOM/GUSD currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ATOM | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 1,299.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Cosmos Hub
GUSD
Pros and cons
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- Higher ranking for Cosmos Hub can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Cosmos Hub has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- ATOM often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Cosmos Hub harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around ATOM sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of GUSD
- Narrative optionality around GUSD can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on GUSD sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- GUSD can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of GUSD
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for GUSD.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GUSD more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus Cosmos Hub can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Cosmos Hub on size and Cosmos Hub on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Cosmos Hub (ATOM) trades near $1.27 with a +3.35% day move, while GUSD (GUSD) is around $1,882.43 (+0.10%). Volume leadership currently sits with Cosmos Hub, and market-cap leadership with Cosmos Hub. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 18.97/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Cosmos Hub or GUSD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Cosmos Hub leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ATOM or GUSD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Cosmos Hub and GUSD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cosmos Hub currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.