Overview
1INCH vs GENIUS is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.081600 | $0.328300 |
| Market Cap | $114.68M | $109.97M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $357,624.93 | $157,759.36 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 233.00 | 242.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.99% | +2.12% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across 1INCH and GENIUS, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
1INCH
GENIUS
Pros and cons
Pros of 1INCH
- 1INCH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for 1INCH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on 1INCH may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of 1INCH
- Crowded positioning around 1INCH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit 1INCH harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on 1INCH may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of GENIUS
- If technical momentum aligns, GENIUS may outperform on medium-term windows.
- GENIUS can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around GENIUS can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of GENIUS
- Higher volatility on GENIUS cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus 1INCH can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on GENIUS often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. 1INCH and GENIUS can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing 1INCH and GENIUS begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.081600 versus $0.328300. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate GENIUS-vs-1INCH pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, 1INCH or GENIUS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. 1INCH leads on market cap today, while GENIUS leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, 1INCH or GENIUS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both 1INCH and GENIUS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GENIUS, but longer windows can disagree.