Overview
Investors searching FRAX vs RAY usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. FRAX prints $0.263000 (+3.30%) while Raydium is at $0.612436 (+2.10%), with volume edge currently on Raydium.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FRAX | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.263000 | $0.612436 |
| Market Cap | $217.35M | $164.93M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $120,487.05 | $7.17M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 152.00 | 180.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FRAX | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.30% | +2.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FRAX | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, FRAX shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Raydium sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FRAX | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
FRAX
Raydium
Pros and cons
Pros of FRAX
- FRAX has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for FRAX can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- FRAX typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for FRAX can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of FRAX
- When dominance narratives fade, FRAX can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit FRAX harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around FRAX sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Raydium
- Narrative optionality around Raydium can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus FRAX with Raydium can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Raydium can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Raydium
- Trend failures on Raydium often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Raydium more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on RAY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to FRAX, while short-term performance leans toward FRAX. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put FRAX at $0.263000 and Raydium at $0.612436. Relative performance over 24h (FRAX) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, FRAX or Raydium?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. FRAX leads on market cap today, while FRAX leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FRAX or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both FRAX and Raydium.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Raydium currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is FRAX, but longer windows can disagree.