Overview
FLR and RAY rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($1,874.22/$0.610450) and 24h leaders (FLR) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FLR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,874.22 | $0.610450 |
| Market Cap | $546.01M | $164.40M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.53M | $6.90M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 94.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FLR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.80% | +1.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FLR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, FLR shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Raydium sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FLR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
FLR
Raydium
Pros and cons
Pros of FLR
- FLR has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for FLR can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- FLR often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of FLR
- Large-cap status for FLR can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit FLR harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, FLR can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Raydium
- Diversifying versus FLR with Raydium can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for Raydium still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around Raydium can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Raydium
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Raydium more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on Raydium often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on RAY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to FLR, while short-term performance leans toward FLR. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: FLR (FLR) trades near $1,874.22 with a +1.80% day move, while Raydium (RAY) is around $0.610450 (+1.50%). Volume leadership currently sits with Raydium, and market-cap leadership with FLR. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, FLR or Raydium?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. FLR leads on market cap today, while FLR leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FLR or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both FLR and Raydium.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Raydium currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is FLR, but longer windows can disagree.