Overview
From a portfolio lens, LEO ($8.98B) and Filecoin ($562.65M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LEO | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,874.22 | $0.720500 |
| Market Cap | $8.98B | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $211,732.00 | $3.75M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 13.00 | 90.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +5.67% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LEO | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.10% | +3.33% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LEO | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 42.21 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 24.60 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, LEO shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Filecoin sits at RSI 42.21 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LEO | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
LEO
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of LEO
- Market-cap scale on LEO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- LEO often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for LEO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of LEO
- Indicator stacks on LEO may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for LEO can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Filecoin
- If technical momentum aligns, Filecoin may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for Filecoin still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around Filecoin can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Filecoin
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus LEO can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Filecoin more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to LEO, while short-term performance leans toward Filecoin. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. LEO holds market-cap $8.98B and rank #13; Filecoin shows $562.65M and #90. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Filecoin. Where durability matters, watch LEO. AI composite scores (58.40/46.00) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, LEO or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. LEO leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LEO or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both LEO and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Filecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.