Overview
From a portfolio lens, QNT ($879.50M) and DYDX ($95.25M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | QNT | DYDX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.49 | $0.112270 |
| Market Cap | $879.50M | $95.25M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $733,707.63 | $281,545.17 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 72.00 | 263.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | QNT | DYDX |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.61% | +0.43% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | QNT | DYDX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on QNT and bearish on DYDX. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | QNT | DYDX |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
QNT
DYDX
Pros and cons
Pros of QNT
- Composite PEPS readings for QNT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- QNT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on QNT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of QNT
- When dominance narratives fade, QNT can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit QNT harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of DYDX
- Diversifying versus QNT with DYDX can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, DYDX may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of DYDX
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave DYDX more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on DYDX cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on DYDX often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. QNT holds market-cap $879.50M and rank #72; DYDX shows $95.25M and #263. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch QNT. Where durability matters, watch QNT. AI composite scores (58.40/58.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, QNT or DYDX?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. QNT leads on market cap today, while DYDX leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, QNT or DYDX?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both QNT and DYDX.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. QNT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is DYDX, but longer windows can disagree.