Overview
Investors searching DCR vs ACRED usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Decred prints $13.32 (+2.30%) while Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund is at $1,102.19 (-0.20%), with volume edge currently on Decred.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | DCR | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $13.32 | $1,102.19 |
| Market Cap | $233.53M | $115.03M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $873,070.00 | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 146.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | DCR | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.30% | -0.20% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | DCR | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.20 vs 58.20) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | DCR | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Decred
Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
Pros and cons
Pros of Decred
- Market-cap scale on Decred may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for Decred can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- DCR often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Decred
- Crowded positioning around DCR sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on Decred may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Decred harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
- Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus Decred can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund.
- Higher volatility on ACRED cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Decred looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, Decred is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Decred holds market-cap $233.53M and rank #146; Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund shows $115.03M and #233. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Decred. Where durability matters, watch Decred. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Decred or Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Decred leads on market cap today, while Decred leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, DCR or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Decred and Apollo Diversified Credit Securitize Fund.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Decred currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Decred, but longer windows can disagree.