Overview
Cosmos Hub vs MANA is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ATOM | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.26 | $0.066700 |
| Market Cap | $723.29M | $130.59M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.50M | $238,444.74 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 85.00 | 213.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ATOM | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.78% | +0.45% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ATOM | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 18.97 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.05 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 51.19 | 21.33 |
| Support | — | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1.61 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for ATOM/MANA currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ATOM | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 1,299.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Cosmos Hub
MANA
Pros and cons
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- Cosmos Hub has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for Cosmos Hub can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Cosmos Hub typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- When dominance narratives fade, Cosmos Hub can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of MANA
- Active volume bursts on MANA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- MANA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Cosmos Hub with MANA can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of MANA
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave MANA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for MANA.
- Higher volatility on MANA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Cosmos Hub on size and Cosmos Hub on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Cosmos Hub (ATOM) trades near $1.26 with a +1.78% day move, while MANA (MANA) is around $0.066700 (+0.45%). Volume leadership currently sits with Cosmos Hub, and market-cap leadership with Cosmos Hub. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 18.97/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Cosmos Hub or MANA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Cosmos Hub leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ATOM or MANA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Cosmos Hub and MANA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cosmos Hub currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.