Overview
From a portfolio lens, ULTIMA ($209.72M) and CHZ ($134.40M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | CHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,856.75 | $0.012840 |
| Market Cap | $209.72M | $134.40M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.55M | $856,016.45 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 156.00 | 210.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | CHZ |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.60% | -0.93% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | CHZ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on ULTIMA and bearish on CHZ. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | CHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ULTIMA
CHZ
Pros and cons
Pros of ULTIMA
- ULTIMA typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for ULTIMA can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on ULTIMA may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Crowded positioning around ULTIMA sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, ULTIMA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on ULTIMA may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of CHZ
- If technical momentum aligns, CHZ may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for CHZ still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus ULTIMA with CHZ can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of CHZ
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus ULTIMA can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on CHZ often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
Comparing ULTIMA and CHZ begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,856.75 versus $0.012840. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate CHZ-vs-ULTIMA pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, ULTIMA or CHZ?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ULTIMA leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or CHZ?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ULTIMA and CHZ.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.