Overview
LINK and WLD rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($8.32/$0.313300) and 24h leaders (WLD) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.32 | $0.313300 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $1.12B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $10.12M | $9.86M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 61.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.87% | +3.95% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Chainlink shows RSI 45.39 with trend bias neutral, while WLD sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
WLD
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Market-cap scale on Chainlink may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for Chainlink can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Chainlink
- Indicator stacks on Chainlink may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for Chainlink can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of WLD
- PEPS tracking for WLD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, WLD may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on WLD sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of WLD
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on WLD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave WLD more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus Chainlink can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Chainlink, while short-term performance leans toward WLD. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Chainlink at $8.32 and WLD at $0.313300. Relative performance over 24h (WLD) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or WLD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and WLD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.