Overview
Investors searching LINK vs RAY usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Chainlink prints $8.33 (+3.63%) while RAY is at $0.609600 (+1.15%), with volume edge currently on Chainlink.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.33 | $0.609600 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $164.07M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.28M | $206,799.09 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.63% | +1.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Chainlink shows RSI 45.39 with trend bias neutral, while RAY sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- LINK often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Chainlink typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for Chainlink can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on Chainlink may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Chainlink
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around LINK sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Chainlink can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of RAY
- If technical momentum aligns, RAY may outperform on medium-term windows.
- RAY can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of RAY
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on RAY often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Chainlink can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Chainlink, while short-term performance leans toward Chainlink. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Chainlink (LINK) trades near $8.33 with a +3.63% day move, while RAY (RAY) is around $0.609600 (+1.15%). Volume leadership currently sits with Chainlink, and market-cap leadership with Chainlink. Technical trend labels read neutral vs bearish, with RSI near 45.39/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.