Overview
Whether you arrived from a “BUIDL vs QNT” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $60.44 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $879.22M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $720,065.58 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 72.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | -1.35% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for BUIDL/QNT currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
QNT
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- BUIDL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of BUIDL
- Crowded positioning around BUIDL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for BUIDL can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of QNT
- If technical momentum aligns, QNT may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for QNT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus BUIDL with QNT can change portfolio factor exposure.
- QNT can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of QNT
- Higher volatility on QNT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave QNT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for BUIDL on size and QNT on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing BUIDL and QNT begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,880.40 versus $60.44. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate QNT-vs-BUIDL pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or QNT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while BUIDL leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or QNT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and QNT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. QNT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BUIDL, but longer windows can disagree.