Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means BAT and ATH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BAT | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.066400 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $99.19M | $77.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $115,059.49 | $4.87M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 257.00 | 295.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BAT | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.22% | -0.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BAT | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for BAT/ATH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BAT | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BAT
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of BAT
- Composite PEPS readings for BAT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on BAT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for BAT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of BAT
- Large-cap status for BAT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BAT harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, BAT can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of ATH
- Diversifying versus BAT with ATH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around ATH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, ATH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on ATH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of ATH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ATH.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ATH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on ATH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for BAT on size and ATH on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BAT holds market-cap $99.19M and rank #257; ATH shows $77.91M and #295. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ATH. Where durability matters, watch BAT. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BAT or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BAT leads on market cap today, while BAT leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BAT or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BAT and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ATH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BAT, but longer windows can disagree.