Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means BEAT and HASH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BEAT | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $1,887.28 |
| Market Cap | $1.03B | $440.26M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $37.47M | $1,642.60 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 65.00 | 105.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BEAT | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -23.00% | -7.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BEAT | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across BEAT and HASH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BEAT | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BEAT
HASH
Pros and cons
Pros of BEAT
- Composite PEPS readings for BEAT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for BEAT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- BEAT typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- BEAT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of BEAT
- Large-cap status for BEAT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around BEAT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BEAT harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of HASH
- Diversifying versus BEAT with HASH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on HASH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- HASH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of HASH
- Trend failures on HASH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on HASH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. BEAT and HASH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing BEAT and HASH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,887.28 versus $1,887.28. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate HASH-vs-BEAT pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, BEAT or HASH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BEAT leads on market cap today, while HASH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BEAT or HASH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BEAT and HASH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BEAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is HASH, but longer windows can disagree.