Overview
Worldcoin (WLD) and Aptos (APT) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($0.316210 vs $0.567804), market leadership still favors Worldcoin on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Worldcoin.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.316210 | $0.567804 |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $480.16M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $107.79M | $28.62M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 62.00 | 101.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +5.39% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | APT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.60% | +1.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | APT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 34.62 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.03 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 28.06 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.64 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Worldcoin shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Aptos sits at RSI 34.62 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Worldcoin
Aptos
Pros and cons
Pros of Worldcoin
- Worldcoin typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- WLD often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for Worldcoin can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Worldcoin
- Indicator stacks on Worldcoin may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Worldcoin can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Aptos
- Aptos can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Worldcoin with Aptos can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Aptos
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus Worldcoin can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Aptos.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Worldcoin, while short-term performance leans toward Worldcoin. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Worldcoin and Aptos solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Worldcoin or Aptos?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Worldcoin leads on market cap today, while Worldcoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or APT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Worldcoin and Aptos.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Worldcoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Worldcoin, but longer windows can disagree.