Overview
SHFL vs 1INCH is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.52 | $0.081700 |
| Market Cap | $122.10M | $114.70M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $686,230.00 | $304,937.56 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 224.00 | 234.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -4.00% | +1.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across SHFL and 1INCH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
SHFL
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of SHFL
- SHFL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- SHFL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- SHFL has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on SHFL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of SHFL
- Crowded positioning around SHFL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit SHFL harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on SHFL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of 1INCH
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on 1INCH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of 1INCH
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. SHFL and 1INCH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing SHFL and 1INCH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,880.52 versus $0.081700. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate 1INCH-vs-SHFL pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, SHFL or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. SHFL leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both SHFL and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SHFL currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.