Overview
NEO (NEO) and 1INCH (1INCH) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($1.83 vs $0.081500), market leadership still favors NEO on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by NEO.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | NEO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.83 | $0.081500 |
| Market Cap | $129.24M | $114.54M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $99,312.36 | $319,738.27 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 215.00 | 234.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | NEO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.10% | +0.99% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | NEO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, NEO shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while 1INCH sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | NEO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
NEO
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of NEO
- Higher ranking for NEO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on NEO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- NEO has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of NEO
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit NEO harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around NEO sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for NEO can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of 1INCH
- Diversifying versus NEO with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of 1INCH
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to NEO, while short-term performance leans toward NEO. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. NEO and 1INCH solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, NEO or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. NEO leads on market cap today, while NEO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, NEO or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both NEO and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is NEO, but longer windows can disagree.