Overview
From a portfolio lens, 1INCH ($114.54M) and USDA ($96.18M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | 1INCH | USDA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.081500 | $1,882.43 |
| Market Cap | $114.54M | $96.18M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $319,738.27 | $1.92 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 234.00 | 262.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | 1INCH | USDA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.99% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | 1INCH | USDA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on 1INCH and bearish on USDA. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | 1INCH | USDA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
1INCH
USDA
Pros and cons
Pros of 1INCH
- 1INCH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on 1INCH may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for 1INCH can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- 1INCH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of 1INCH
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Indicator stacks on 1INCH may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, 1INCH can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of USDA
- USDA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, USDA may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus 1INCH with USDA can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of USDA
- Relative underperformance versus 1INCH can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave USDA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. 1INCH holds market-cap $114.54M and rank #234; USDA shows $96.18M and #262. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch 1INCH. Where durability matters, watch 1INCH. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, 1INCH or USDA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. 1INCH leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, 1INCH or USDA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both 1INCH and USDA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.