Overview
Whether you arrived from a “ULTIMA vs SYRUP” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $0.155300 |
| Market Cap | $210.39M | $194.36M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.42M | $333,252.61 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 155.00 | 171.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.70% | -1.27% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ULTIMA
SYRUP
Pros and cons
Pros of ULTIMA
- Composite PEPS readings for ULTIMA can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- ULTIMA often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for ULTIMA can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of ULTIMA
- When dominance narratives fade, ULTIMA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for ULTIMA can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on ULTIMA may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit ULTIMA harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of SYRUP
- Active volume bursts on SYRUP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus ULTIMA with SYRUP can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for SYRUP still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of SYRUP
- Trend failures on SYRUP often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave SYRUP more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus ULTIMA can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SYRUP.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (ULTIMA) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (ULTIMA) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
Comparing ULTIMA and SYRUP begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,861.70 versus $0.155300. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate SYRUP-vs-ULTIMA pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, ULTIMA or SYRUP?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ULTIMA leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or SYRUP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ULTIMA and SYRUP.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.