Overview
This page compares BUIDL and ULTIMA with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#35 vs #155) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,865.83 | $1,865.83 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $206.72M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $3.27M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 155.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +3.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across BUIDL and ULTIMA, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- BUIDL has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- BUIDL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of BUIDL
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around BUIDL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of ULTIMA
- If technical momentum aligns, ULTIMA may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for ULTIMA still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus BUIDL with ULTIMA can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on ULTIMA often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. BUIDL and ULTIMA can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BUIDL holds market-cap $2.70B and rank #35; ULTIMA shows $206.72M and #155. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ULTIMA. Where durability matters, watch BUIDL. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.