Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Ultima vs Ape and Pepe” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | APEPE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,452.37 | $0.000001 |
| Market Cap | $207.64M | $201.25M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.89M | $4.92M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 157.00 | 160.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | APEPE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.10% | +0.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | APEPE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | APEPE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Ultima
Ape and Pepe
Pros and cons
Pros of Ultima
- Ultima has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for Ultima can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Ultima typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Ultima can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Ultima
- Large-cap status for Ultima can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on Ultima may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Ultima can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Ape and Pepe
- Diversifying versus Ultima with Ape and Pepe can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on APEPE sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for Ape and Pepe still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around Ape and Pepe can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Ape and Pepe
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Ape and Pepe.
- Trend failures on Ape and Pepe often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Ultima can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Ultima) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Ultima) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
Comparing ULTIMA and APEPE begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $2,452.37 versus $0.000001. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate APEPE-vs-ULTIMA pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Ultima or Ape and Pepe?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Ultima leads on market cap today, while Ultima leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or APEPE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Ultima and Ape and Pepe.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Ape and Pepe currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Ultima, but longer windows can disagree.