Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Chainlink vs RUNE” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.32 | $0.445000 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $150.40M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $10.12M | $530,260.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 194.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.87% | +2.54% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for LINK/RUNE currently lean on separate regimes: neutral versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
RUNE
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Chainlink has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on Chainlink may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Chainlink can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Chainlink
- Large-cap status for Chainlink can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Chainlink harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of RUNE
- Narrative optionality around RUNE can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on RUNE sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, RUNE may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus Chainlink with RUNE can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of RUNE
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RUNE.
- Trend failures on RUNE often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Chainlink on size and Chainlink on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing LINK and RUNE begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $8.32 versus $0.445000. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate RUNE-vs-LINK pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or RUNE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or RUNE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and RUNE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.