Overview
Compound (COMP) and The Graph (GRT) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($16.42 vs $0.014572), market leadership still favors Compound on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by The Graph.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | COMP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $16.42 | $0.014572 |
| Market Cap | $164.15M | $157.32M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $6.26M | $10.28M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 186.00 | 189.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | COMP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.50% | +2.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | COMP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Compound shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while The Graph sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | COMP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Compound
The Graph
Pros and cons
Pros of Compound
- Market-cap scale on Compound may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for Compound can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Compound typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Compound
- Indicator stacks on Compound may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Compound harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of The Graph
- The Graph can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on GRT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for The Graph still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of The Graph
- Relative underperformance versus Compound can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on GRT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for The Graph.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Compound, while short-term performance leans toward The Graph. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Compound and The Graph solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Compound or The Graph?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Compound leads on market cap today, while The Graph leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, COMP or GRT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Compound and The Graph.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. The Graph currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is The Graph, but longer windows can disagree.