Overview
The Graph (GRT) and Chutes (SN64) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($0.014387 vs $16.17), market leadership still favors The Graph on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Chutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GRT | SN64 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.014387 | $16.17 |
| Market Cap | $155.36M | $90.17M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $10.11M | $848,737.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 192.00 | 274.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GRT | SN64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.20% | +0.90% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GRT | SN64 |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, The Graph shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Chutes sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GRT | SN64 |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
The Graph
Chutes
Pros and cons
Pros of The Graph
- Composite PEPS readings for The Graph can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- The Graph typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for The Graph can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of The Graph
- When dominance narratives fade, The Graph can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on The Graph may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit The Graph harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Chutes
- Narrative optionality around Chutes can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on SN64 sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, Chutes may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus The Graph with Chutes can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Chutes
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Chutes more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus The Graph can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on Chutes often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to The Graph, while short-term performance leans toward Chutes. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. The Graph and Chutes solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, The Graph or Chutes?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. The Graph leads on market cap today, while Chutes leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GRT or SN64?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both The Graph and Chutes.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. The Graph currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chutes, but longer windows can disagree.