Overview
This page compares SUN and ULTIMA with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#117 vs #156) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SUN | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.017950 | $1,856.75 |
| Market Cap | $344.60M | $209.72M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $286,670.80 | $2.55M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 117.00 | 156.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SUN | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.34% | +4.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SUN | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for SUN/ULTIMA currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SUN | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
SUN
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of SUN
- Market-cap scale on SUN may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for SUN can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- SUN typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of SUN
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, SUN can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on SUN may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of ULTIMA
- ULTIMA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus SUN with ULTIMA can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Relative underperformance versus SUN can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on ULTIMA often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for SUN on size and ULTIMA on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. SUN holds market-cap $344.60M and rank #117; ULTIMA shows $209.72M and #156. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ULTIMA. Where durability matters, watch SUN. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, SUN or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. SUN leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SUN or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both SUN and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.