Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Sui and WLD are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SUI | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.687900 | $0.316100 |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $1.13B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $8.29M | $8.84M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 32.00 | 61.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SUI | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.09% | +1.31% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SUI | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 43.42 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.03 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 19.19 | 20.44 |
| Support | 0.66 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.78 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for SUI/WLD currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SUI | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 219.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,403.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sui
WLD
Pros and cons
Pros of Sui
- Composite PEPS readings for Sui can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Sui can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Sui typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Sui has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Sui
- Large-cap status for Sui can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on Sui may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Sui harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of WLD
- Diversifying versus Sui with WLD can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around WLD can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for WLD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of WLD
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave WLD more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for WLD.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on WLD often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Sui on size and WLD on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Sui (SUI) trades near $0.687900 with a -0.09% day move, while WLD (WLD) is around $0.316100 (+1.31%). Volume leadership currently sits with WLD, and market-cap leadership with Sui. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 43.42/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Sui or WLD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sui leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SUI or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sui and WLD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.