Overview
Investors searching SKY vs WLD usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. SKY prints $0.056080 (+0.65%) while WLD is at $0.313300 (+3.95%), with volume edge currently on WLD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SKY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.056080 | $0.313300 |
| Market Cap | $1.31B | $1.12B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $266,750.83 | $9.86M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 56.00 | 61.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SKY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.65% | +3.95% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SKY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, SKY shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while WLD sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SKY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
SKY
WLD
Pros and cons
Pros of SKY
- Market-cap scale on SKY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- SKY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of SKY
- Crowded positioning around SKY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, SKY can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of WLD
- PEPS tracking for WLD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- WLD can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus SKY with WLD can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of WLD
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on WLD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on WLD often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to SKY, while short-term performance leans toward WLD. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing SKY and WLD begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.056080 versus $0.313300. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate WLD-vs-SKY pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, SKY or WLD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. SKY leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SKY or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both SKY and WLD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.