Overview
From a portfolio lens, USDY ($2.15B) and Shuffle ($114.68M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.76 | $0.269769 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $114.68M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.96M | $1.47M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 232.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.10% | -9.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, USDY shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while Shuffle sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
Shuffle
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- USDY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on USDY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of USDY
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit USDY harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, USDY can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around USDY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Shuffle
- Narrative optionality around Shuffle can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for Shuffle still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Shuffle
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Shuffle.
- Trend failures on Shuffle often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on SHFL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to USDY, while short-term performance leans toward USDY. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing USDY and SHFL begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,861.76 versus $0.269769. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate SHFL-vs-USDY pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or Shuffle?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while USDY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and Shuffle.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is USDY, but longer windows can disagree.