Overview
From a portfolio lens, JST ($867.89M) and Sei ($301.91M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.106110 | $0.041270 |
| Market Cap | $867.89M | $301.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.51M | $809,257.92 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 74.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.67% | +0.63% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JST shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while Sei sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
Sei
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- JST typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- JST often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for JST can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of JST
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around JST sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, JST can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on JST may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Sei
- Sei can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for Sei still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus JST with Sei can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Sei may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Sei
- Higher volatility on SEI cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Sei often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JST, while short-term performance leans toward JST. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. JST and Sei solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or Sei?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while JST leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or SEI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and Sei.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JST currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JST, but longer windows can disagree.