Overview
From a portfolio lens, ULTIMA ($208.38M) and USDAT ($106.94M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $208.38M | $106.94M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3.02M | $983,080.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 156.00 | 248.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.30% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, ULTIMA shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while USDAT sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ULTIMA
USDAT
Pros and cons
Pros of ULTIMA
- ULTIMA has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for ULTIMA can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- ULTIMA typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Large-cap status for ULTIMA can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, ULTIMA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of USDAT
- Narrative optionality around USDAT can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on USDAT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for USDAT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of USDAT
- Trend failures on USDAT often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on USDAT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave USDAT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to ULTIMA, while short-term performance leans toward ULTIMA. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. ULTIMA and USDAT solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, ULTIMA or USDAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ULTIMA leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or USDAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ULTIMA and USDAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.