Overview
Whether you arrived from a “BUIDL vs USDAT” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,857.63 | $1,857.63 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $106.93M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $946,938.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 34.00 | 246.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across BUIDL and USDAT, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
USDAT
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of BUIDL
- Crowded positioning around BUIDL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BUIDL harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of USDAT
- PEPS tracking for USDAT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, USDAT may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around USDAT can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of USDAT
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for USDAT.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. BUIDL and USDAT can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BUIDL holds market-cap $2.70B and rank #34; USDAT shows $106.93M and #246. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch USDAT. Where durability matters, watch BUIDL. AI composite scores (57.30/57.30) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or USDAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while BUIDL / USDAT leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or USDAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and USDAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BUIDL / USDAT, but longer windows can disagree.