Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Shuffle and Reserve Rights are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | RSR |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.272718 | $0.001251 |
| Market Cap | $115.99M | $78.28M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.55M | $7.44M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 230.00 | 293.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | RSR |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -7.70% | -3.40% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | RSR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for SHFL/RSR currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | RSR |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Shuffle
Reserve Rights
Pros and cons
Pros of Shuffle
- Composite PEPS readings for Shuffle can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Shuffle can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- SHFL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Shuffle
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Shuffle harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, Shuffle can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Reserve Rights
- Narrative optionality around Reserve Rights can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, Reserve Rights may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Reserve Rights
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Reserve Rights more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on Reserve Rights often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Shuffle on size and Reserve Rights on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Shuffle and Reserve Rights solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Shuffle or Reserve Rights?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Shuffle leads on market cap today, while Reserve Rights leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or RSR?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Shuffle and Reserve Rights.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Reserve Rights currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Reserve Rights, but longer windows can disagree.