Overview
Whether you arrived from a “United Stables vs Raydium” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | U | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.999723 | $0.605618 |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $163.11M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $61.63M | $7.33M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 64.00 | 180.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | U | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.40% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | U | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for U/RAY currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | U | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
United Stables
Raydium
Pros and cons
Pros of United Stables
- United Stables typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for United Stables can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of United Stables
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around U sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, United Stables can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on United Stables may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Raydium
- PEPS tracking for Raydium still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Raydium can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Raydium
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on RAY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Raydium often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for United Stables on size and United Stables on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: United Stables (U) trades near $0.999723 with a +0.00% day move, while Raydium (RAY) is around $0.605618 (+0.40%). Volume leadership currently sits with United Stables, and market-cap leadership with United Stables. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, United Stables or Raydium?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. United Stables leads on market cap today, while Raydium leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, U or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both United Stables and Raydium.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. United Stables currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Raydium, but longer windows can disagree.