Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means RAY and SAND are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.608900 | $0.043130 |
| Market Cap | $163.75M | $129.34M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $216,931.51 | $512,413.86 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 180.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.78% | +2.91% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across RAY and SAND, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
SAND
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- RAY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- RAY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for RAY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of RAY
- Crowded positioning around RAY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on RAY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for RAY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of SAND
- If technical momentum aligns, SAND may outperform on medium-term windows.
- SAND can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus RAY with SAND can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for SAND still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of SAND
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on SAND cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on SAND often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus RAY can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. RAY and SAND can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: RAY (RAY) trades near $0.608900 with a +0.78% day move, while SAND (SAND) is around $0.043130 (+2.91%). Volume leadership currently sits with SAND, and market-cap leadership with RAY. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or SAND?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while SAND leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or SAND?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and SAND.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SAND currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is SAND, but longer windows can disagree.