Overview
Investors searching SUN vs RAY usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. SUN prints $0.017980 (+0.50%) while RAY is at $0.610700 (+1.99%), with volume edge currently on SUN.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.017980 | $0.610700 |
| Market Cap | $344.85M | $164.40M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $263,842.79 | $188,674.63 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 117.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.50% | +1.99% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.40 vs 58.40) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
SUN
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of SUN
- Market-cap scale on SUN may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- SUN typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- SUN has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- SUN often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of SUN
- Indicator stacks on SUN may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, SUN can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around SUN sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of RAY
- If technical momentum aligns, RAY may outperform on medium-term windows.
- RAY can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus SUN with RAY can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of RAY
- Relative underperformance versus SUN can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave RAY more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, SUN looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, RAY is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing SUN and RAY begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.017980 versus $0.610700. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate RAY-vs-SUN pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, SUN or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. SUN leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SUN or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both SUN and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SUN currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.