Overview
Investors searching GRASS vs RAY usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. GRASS prints $1,880.40 (+3.10%) while RAY is at $0.611100 (+1.09%), with volume edge currently on GRASS.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GRASS | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.611100 |
| Market Cap | $208.40M | $164.68M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $10.38M | $203,861.39 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 157.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GRASS | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.10% | +1.09% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GRASS | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on GRASS and bearish on RAY. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GRASS | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GRASS
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of GRASS
- Composite PEPS readings for GRASS can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- GRASS has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- GRASS typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of GRASS
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GRASS harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, GRASS can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around GRASS sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of RAY
- Diversifying versus GRASS with RAY can change portfolio factor exposure.
- RAY can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of RAY
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave RAY more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus GRASS can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put GRASS at $1,880.40 and RAY at $0.611100. Relative performance over 24h (GRASS) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, GRASS or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GRASS leads on market cap today, while GRASS leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GRASS or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GRASS and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GRASS currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GRASS, but longer windows can disagree.