Overview
From a portfolio lens, GHO ($648.05M) and RAY ($165.69M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GHO | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $0.615700 |
| Market Cap | $648.05M | $165.69M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.42M | $201,019.94 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 87.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GHO | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +2.19% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GHO | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, GHO shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while RAY sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GHO | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GHO
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of GHO
- Market-cap scale on GHO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- GHO typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for GHO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of GHO
- Indicator stacks on GHO may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around GHO sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, GHO can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of RAY
- If technical momentum aligns, RAY may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for RAY still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of RAY
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus GHO can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to GHO, while short-term performance leans toward RAY. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: GHO (GHO) trades near $1,887.28 with a +0.00% day move, while RAY (RAY) is around $0.615700 (+2.19%). Volume leadership currently sits with GHO, and market-cap leadership with GHO. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, GHO or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GHO leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GHO or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GHO and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GHO currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.