Overview
RAY and USDF rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($0.605618/$0.998474) and 24h leaders (Raydium) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | USDF |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.605618 | $0.998474 |
| Market Cap | $163.11M | $112.53M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $7.33M | $57,779.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 180.00 | 239.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | USDF |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.40% | +0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | USDF |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on RAY and bearish on USDF. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | USDF |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Raydium
Aster USDF
Pros and cons
Pros of Raydium
- Raydium typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Raydium can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on Raydium may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Raydium
- Crowded positioning around RAY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on Raydium may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for Raydium can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Aster USDF
- PEPS tracking for Aster USDF still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, Aster USDF may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around Aster USDF can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Aster USDF
- Relative underperformance versus Raydium can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Aster USDF.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Raydium (RAY) trades near $0.605618 with a +0.40% day move, while Aster USDF (USDF) is around $0.998474 (+0.10%). Volume leadership currently sits with Raydium, and market-cap leadership with Raydium. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Raydium or Aster USDF?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Raydium leads on market cap today, while Raydium leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or USDF?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Raydium and Aster USDF.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Raydium currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Raydium, but longer windows can disagree.