Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Raydium vs Akash Network” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | AKT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.610450 | $0.467761 |
| Market Cap | $164.40M | $138.62M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $6.90M | $4.02M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 207.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | AKT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.50% | -0.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | AKT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | AKT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Raydium
Akash Network
Pros and cons
Pros of Raydium
- Raydium typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for Raydium can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Raydium
- Crowded positioning around RAY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, Raydium can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Akash Network
- Akash Network can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, Akash Network may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus Raydium with Akash Network can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for Akash Network still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Akash Network
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Akash Network more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Raydium) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Raydium) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Raydium holds market-cap $164.40M and rank #179; Akash Network shows $138.62M and #207. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Raydium. Where durability matters, watch Raydium. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Raydium or Akash Network?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Raydium leads on market cap today, while Raydium leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or AKT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Raydium and Akash Network.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Raydium currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Raydium, but longer windows can disagree.