Overview
This page compares QNT and 1INCH with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#72 vs #234) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.64 | $0.081900 |
| Market Cap | $881.45M | $114.84M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $720,413.09 | $351,080.55 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 72.00 | 234.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.16% | +1.36% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for QNT/1INCH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
QNT
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of QNT
- Market-cap scale on QNT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- QNT typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for QNT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of QNT
- Crowded positioning around QNT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for QNT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on QNT may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of 1INCH
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of 1INCH
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for QNT on size and QNT on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing QNT and 1INCH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $60.64 versus $0.081900. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate 1INCH-vs-QNT pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, QNT or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. QNT leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, QNT or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both QNT and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. QNT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.