Overview
PUMP vs GNO is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PUMP | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002156 | $104.10 |
| Market Cap | $852.13M | $274.35M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $10.20M | $99,339.69 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 75.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PUMP | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.22% | -0.98% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PUMP | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PUMP | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
PUMP
GNO
Pros and cons
Pros of PUMP
- PUMP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- PUMP typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- PUMP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of PUMP
- Crowded positioning around PUMP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit PUMP harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of GNO
- PEPS tracking for GNO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- GNO can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on GNO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, GNO may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of GNO
- Relative underperformance versus PUMP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on GNO often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (PUMP) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (PUMP) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. PUMP holds market-cap $852.13M and rank #75; GNO shows $274.35M and #129. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch PUMP. Where durability matters, watch PUMP. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, PUMP or GNO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. PUMP leads on market cap today, while PUMP leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PUMP or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both PUMP and GNO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PUMP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is PUMP, but longer windows can disagree.