Overview
From a portfolio lens, PEPE ($1.22B) and ULTIMA ($209.72M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PEPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000003 | $1,856.75 |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $209.72M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $16.74M | $2.55M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 58.00 | 156.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PEPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.85% | +4.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PEPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, PEPE shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while ULTIMA sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PEPE | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
PEPE
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of PEPE
- Market-cap scale on PEPE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- PEPE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for PEPE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of PEPE
- Crowded positioning around PEPE sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, PEPE can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of ULTIMA
- If technical momentum aligns, ULTIMA may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around ULTIMA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- ULTIMA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Relative underperformance versus PEPE can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ULTIMA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to PEPE, while short-term performance leans toward ULTIMA. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing PEPE and ULTIMA begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.000003 versus $1,856.75. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate ULTIMA-vs-PEPE pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, PEPE or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. PEPE leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PEPE or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both PEPE and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PEPE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.